Why your penetration test findings never get fixed

A test that produces a report nobody acts on has cost you money and bought you nothing. Here is how to structure an engagement so the findings actually close.

Most organisations we meet have had a penetration test. Far fewer have fixed what it found.

The report is not the deliverable

A findings report is an input to a remediation programme, not the end of one. If your test ends when the PDF arrives, you have bought a snapshot of your weaknesses and nothing else.

Three things that make findings close

1. Prioritise by exploitability, not by CVSS alone

A medium-severity issue reachable from the internet without credentials matters more than a high-severity one requiring domain admin. Ask your tester to rank by realistic attack path.

2. Cost the remediation

"Implement network segmentation" is not an action. "Move the six payment-processing hosts into their own VLAN, estimated four engineer-days" is.

3. Book the retest before the test

A retest date in the calendar changes behaviour more than any amount of urgency in an executive summary.

If nobody is accountable for closing a finding by a date, it will not close.

What good looks like

The engagements that work have a named owner per finding, a target date, and a retest booked. Everything else is theatre.

Keep reading